food supply is used by governmental bodies to limit and control the population

After recently watching the documentary "King Corn" by filmmakers Ian Cheney and Curtis Ellis, the state of the nation’s, and in turn the world’s food supply was on my mind.

Why has industrial corn - used for derivative food ingredients and now comprised almost wholly of genetically modified varieties - become such a huge part of our lives?

Apparently much of the reason for the rise of corn is tied with Big Agra business and a Secretary of Agriculture named Earl Butz, who was appointed to office under President Nixon and kept under President Ford.

In doing some basic research on Butz, I encountered not only his scandals over racial remarks or his mocking of the Pope for not backing overt population control, but the file stubs of LaRouche PAC, who heavily covered his involvement in Ford Administration affairs and his controversial role at the key 1974 United Nations World Food Conference, which set up the World Food Council (suspended in 1993), derived from a Rockefeller proposal for a World Food Bank.

Just weeks before Nelson Rockefeller would be appointed Vice President of the United States, the Rockefeller machine had been threatening administration officials held over from the Nixon Administration to go along with the agenda, including that of a world food authority.

One of those figures was Earl Butz, who according to LaRouche press releases at the time, was targeted in the New York Times and pressured by attacks from ranking political figures including Nixon’s opponent and Democratic presidential candidaten George McGover.

The result, reported below in a vintage LaRouche publication, details how Secretary of Agriculture Earl Butz "capitulated" to these demands during his role at the November 1974 UN World Food Conference in Rome, reversing his position, and backing the "Malthusian" eugenics views on controlling the world food supply in conjunction with efforts to limit the population.

According to LaRouche:

Butz, who officially heads the U.S. delegation, call for the establishment of a new "world food agency" along the same lines proposed by the UN’s Food and Agricutlure Organization (FAO).

The Rockefeller Foundation-authored FAO proposal would establish a supranational agency allowing the Rockefeller cabal fingertip control over world food supplies.

Click here for Full Issue of EIR

Volume 1, Number 30, November 6, 1974

This remains highly significant, as Butz remained through the Ford Administration and frequently consulted with the President and National Security Advisor and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger on food aid policy, food prices and production, among other matters.

Significantly, just one month after the pivotal 1974 United Nations World Food Conference, Henry Kissinger officially issued the National Security Council document "National Security Study Memorandum 200 - Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests" (NSSM 200 for short).

This document, which was also heavily analyzed by LaRouche PAC, called for using "food as a weapon" to aid in Third World depopulation efforts.

The document specifically identified 13 key countries for depopulation as a top priority under national security interests. One part of the proposal discusses withholding food aid to induce population reduction and family planning on the basis of food shortages.

Kissinger states,

"It is questionable whether aid donor countries will be prepared to provide the sort of massive food aid called for by the import projections on a long-term continuing basis," suggesting that Western nations might opt out of giving rations to countries that have not followed international programs to cut population numbers.

According to Kissinger’s National Security Council,

"Mandatory programs may be needed and we should be considering these possibilities now," adding in NSSM 200, "Would food be considered an instrument of national power?… Is the U.S. prepared to accept food rationing to help people who can’t/won’t control their population growth?"

The veiled threat is clear as Kissinger, a top Rockefeller envoy places a high priority on reducing population, is directing U.S. foreign policy, in the name of national security, to essentially blackmail countries into compliance with "family planning" programs to implement contraceptives, sterilizations and abortions to reduce the birthrate with the leverage of food supply and food aid.

"There is also some established precedent for taking account of family planning performance in appraisal of assistance requirements by AID [U.S. Agency for International Development] and consultative groups.

Since population growth is a major determinant of increases in food demand, allocation of scarce PL 480 resources should take account of what steps a country is taking in population control as well as food production.

In these sensitive relations, however, it is important in style as well as substance to avoid the appearance of coercion."

NWO Chemtrails Of Death

The problem is so utterly simple, it's ridiculous. What on earth do you thing would happen if you handed money making rights to a private bank? Before you know it, the owners of that bank would own all the politicians, all the judges, the military, DA's, cops, corporations and your home.

  

The Federal Reserve Bank is a private bank. It is as much a part of the government as Federal Express. The claim that the US President appoints their chairman is in fact obviously the opposite way around.  He who holds the purse strings controls it all.

The obvious is right in front of us. Now all the evidence is emerging as the great printing press of Internet and computers usher in this New Renaissance and Reformation.

The owners of the Central Banks have been directly responsible in initiating, funding and perpetrating all the major wars, depressions and recessions. These criminals are being completely exposed. Their crimes are being illuminated.

The only way these banksters can deflect what will obviously be a violent backlash is to pre-empt the inevitable by wiping out those who would hold them accountable.

They started with bogus claims of Global Warming and that the world is over populated. Get on a plane and fly from city to city and you will witness the swaths of open space. Consider that, for example in the US, the little valley of Salinas grows around 80% of the lettuce for the entire United State of America. The world is not overpopulated, just poorly managed and exploited, by the very people who are crying wolf, the bankers and their NWO.  Now consider pollution. As a direct consequence of the bankers silencing fuels other than oil, the world has suffered outrageous pollution.  However, the direct acts of these bankers in their repeated wars has caused the greatest man-made ecological disaster and destruction of life on earth, ever.

• NWO / Federal Reserve Bank / Rothschild's / Pope's Wars; Pollution:
• The 18 Million Gallons of Agent Orange the US dumped on Vietnam that is now washing into the ocean.
• 2,000 tons of Nuclear Waste blasted in the form of DU into the Iraq and Afghanistan by the US in the Gulf War - the half-life of this uranium is four and a half billion years. DU is around 40% depleted over regular uranium - when the DU rounds hit a target they are subject to extraordinary heat and phase changes.
• U.S. Military dumping 64 Million Pounds of Chemical Weapons in the sea.
• New Nuclear Weapons Testing in the open just outside Tracy near San Francisco - and all the other insane nuclear weapons tests, including exploding nuclear bombs high in the atmosphere!
• The tons and tons of fluoride and other chemicals the government put in the water to sedate the people.
• Perhaps what will be the worlds worst ecological disaster ever - the millions of gallons of barium, aluminum oxide and other chemicals the New World Order is spraying over every populated area with their Chemtrails.

These bankers are a curse to society and the world in general. They have utilized money they made out of nothing to make wars, depressions, pollution, to enslave the people and steal the world.

The New World Order's idea of one government and centralized control is the most ridiculous and utterly idiotic idea ever. Any person with minimal managerial experience knows full well that the larger an organization the more difficult it is to manage, even laborers know that the more levels there are to management the more out of control things become. Who does not know the larger the government the more incompetent it is! A one world government is perhaps the most idiotic idea ever.

David Rockefeller addressing the Trilateral Commission in June, 1991 said: “We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto determination practiced in past centuries.”

We are glad David Rockefeller believes he is intellectual elite, however, his very reasoning, construct and lack of real world experience, perhaps reflects an alternate. However, can anyone blame him when the Rockefeller's are one of the few lucky owners of the private Federal Reserve Bank? At least the Rockefeller's are citizens of the USA, presumably. Naturally David Rockefeller wants his bank and who (he) the bank defines as "intellectually elite" to be our king, queen and Pope. Or as Mr. Rockefeller puts it he wants "Supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers" to lord it over we the people. This is exactly the opposite of American values and the construct of Novus Ordo Seclorum.

David Rockefeller, claim that the press has allowed these bankers to conduct criminal acts of fraud and the destruction of civilization without much criticism is not entirely true. Whenever anyone speaks out against these destroyers of civilization, they hammer them. Usually the bankers employ a round about way to assault those who illuminate their crime - who killed Kennedy? U.S. Censorship of reporters who report the truth occurs every day and Extreme Censorship by US Military is common practice. Reporters are speaking out, they are simply being silenced.  What would one expect when you have a bank that makes money out of nothing and claims to be sovereign.

Novus Ordo Seclorum, the very heart and soul of what the United States of America is founded on, is built entirely on the construct of exactly the opposite of what David Rockefeller proposes. In Novus Ordo Seclorum, the New Order of the Ages, in English, we the people are the government, we the people are sovereign. In the USA sovereignty is stripped from the State and especially the bankers!

What person in their right mind will pronounce bankers as sovereign, mammon as their master? Well, perhaps someone who owns the fraudulent and criminal private money making machine, surely they would pronounce such a one-world sovereign banker government.

How Cancer Politics Have Kept You in the Dark Regarding Successful Alternatives.

A powerful conglomerate of government agencies, international drug companies, and major cancer treatment hospitals puts profits first. They do not want the public to learn about and pursue effective alternatives. The result is that chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery are the law of the land as cancer treatments-for political, not therapeutic, reasons.

Recent news has shown that the majority of studies geared towards cancer research are inaccurate and likely fraudulent by nature. Findings published in the journal Nature show that 88% of major studies on cancer that have been published in reputable journals over the years can not be reproduced to show their accuracy. This means that the research findings published are flat-out false.

Author of the review and former head of cancer research at Amgen, C. Glenn Begley, was unable to replicate the results of 47 of the 53 studies he examined. This suggests that researchers are fabricating their findings simply to create the illusion of positive findings instead of publishing their actual results. This ensures the continuation of their steady stream of funding and grants...

Most of what you have heard over your lifetime about cancer treatments is not the truth. At the very least, you have received an incomplete picture. If you believe the propaganda you have been fed and you develop cancer; it can cost you your life.In the United States, economic interests masquerade as therapeutic regimens and scientific concern. Their goal is to own and completely control a disease-cancer-as if it were a commodity, and to quash competition (meaning alternative approaches), so as to maintain a marketplace monopoly.Money leads politics by the nose. The financial interests of drug companies, conventional cancer doctors, hospitals, HMOs and others in what is known as the Cancer Establishment, have eclipsed the integrity of the Hippocratic Oath; money and politics have proclaimed conventional approaches as scientifically validated and therefore mandated by law. The terrible flaw in this convenient financial setup is that the profits that flow to the cancer establishment are derived from human lives lost to cancer because successful alternative approaches are outlawed or unreported.To the cancer establishment, a cancer patient is a profit center. The actual clinical and scientific evidence does not support the claims of the cancer industry. Conventional cancer treatments are in place as the law of the land because they pay, not heal, the best. Decades of the politics-of-cancer-as-usual have kept you from knowing this, and will continue to do so unless you wake up to their reality.Although rising cancer rates are bad news for patients, they are great news for the cancer treatment industry-Cancer, Inc., as some critics have labeled it. In this environment, words that sound scientific and doctorly often mask a different agenda. The phrase "treatment success" can mean profitable, while "dangerous" or "questionable" treatment can refer to therapies that threaten the profits of the cancer industry. When you begin to ferret out the economic context and motivations of cancer treatment, it helps you understand why alternative cancer therapies are suppressed or barred from the public's awareness. It helps you see why treatments as dangerous and consistently unsuccessful as radiation and chemotherapy continue to dominate the field of oncology.The reason alternative cancer treatments are not mainstream has little to do with alleged therapeutic ineffectiveness and far more to do with political control over the therapy marketplace. The politics of cancer have an overriding influence on the science of cancer and, ultimately, on what the public thinks and believes about cancer and what it is able to expect as treatment options. The doctors who perform cancer treatments and the scientists who conduct research are not the ones in control of the cancer field. It is the larger power structure of the cancer establishment that effectively controls the shape and direction of cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.' The field of U.S. cancer care is organized around a medical monopoly that ensures a continuous flow of money to the pharmaceutical companies, medical technology firms, research institutes, and government agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and quasi-public organizations such as the American Cancer Society (ACS). This is "the cancer industry," says Ralph Moss, Ph.D., extensions of which include the corporate media, public relations experts, petrochemical and nuclear industries, corporate scientists, and doctors who specialize in "killing" cancer.Cancer research has been set up almost entirely in favor of conventional approaches ever since the war on cancer, formalized in 1971 as the National Cancer Act, was first scripted in the 1960s. At that time, Senator Ralph Yarborough (D-Texas) organized the National Panel of Consultants of the Conquest of Cancer Of its 26 members, 10 came from the American Cancer Society and 4 were affiliated with Memorial Sloan-Kettering Hospital; Benno Schmidt, M.D., the director of Memorial Sloan-Kettering's Cancer (Center was the panel's chairman, and Sidney Farber, M.D., former president of the ACS, was its vice chairman.

Websitewww.alternative.medicine.com

http://www.chelationtherapyonline.com/anatomy/p85.htm

global scale food poisoning

Food is supposed to provide us nourishment and health but because of the toxins it contains, what we consume has become a major threat to our health. Some toxic substances are added to our food physically, through adulteration, while some enter our food system chemically, through pesticide residues. And some toxins enter the food chain genetically, through genetic engineering of seeds and crops. Even food packaging can be a source of toxins in food.

While physical adulteration, like stones in pulses, can be removed, the chemicals can’t be. The pollutants will stop entering our food system only when poisonous chemicals are banned. Genetic pollution and contamination of food is the new, big threat to food safety and it cannot be undone. Once toxic genes are put into a plant, they are in the genetic code. There is no rollback. Which is why the debate on biosafety of GMOs is so intense.

With growing consumerism and greed, food safety is being bypassed. The distance between growers and eaters is getting larger and being ignorant about what comprises our food is getting deeper. Traders adulterate food to make more money, and consumers, manipulated to focus on the cosmetic appearance, buy adulterated food not knowing what they are eating. Government agencies, which are supposed to inspect and stop adulteration, fail because of corruption and inadequate support.

We are eating hazardous substances every day. Copper salts are used to colour pickles and canned vegetables green. The craze for the cosmetic appearance of food has created a market for dyes injected in watermelon, peas, capsicum and brinjal. Brick dust in chilli powder, coloured chalk powder in turmeric, and papaya seeds in black pepper are old tricks.

With new chemicals available in the market, adulteration has reached new levels. Apples are sprayed with lead arsenate; turmeric and mixed spices are adulterated with lead chromate. These substances can cause anaemia, abortion and paralysis.

One of the worst tragedies of food adulteration was the 2008 Chinese milk scandal, which was a food safety issue involving milk and infant formula adulterated with melamine. Melamine is an industrial chemical used to manufacture melamine-formaldehyde resin, a type of plastic known for its flame retardant properties. When added to milk, it caused it to appear to have higher protein content. But melamine causes renal and urinary problems and its use in food production is universally banned. The milk scandal broke in July 2008. By November there were 300,000 victims, with six infants dying from kidney stones and other kidney complications.

If the Chinese were using melamine in milk, the Indians are using urea to make synthetic milk. Synthetic milk is produced by mixing urea, caustic soda, cheap cooking oil, detergents, water and a tiny bit of natural milk. It has the colour, the structure and even the fat levels of natural milk and thus clears the basic tests. Synthetic milk can cause loss of sight and hearing and is even said to cause cancer.

Oxytocin is a hormone secreted and stored by the posterior pituitary gland that contributes to the second stage of labour. It has uterine-contracting and milk-ejecting actions. Oxytocin is now available as an artificial drug for use in emergencies. The drug can lead to the rupture of the uterus and, in rare cases, rupture of the womb. While the oxytocin for humans is priced at `15 per ampule, veterinary oxytocin is priced at 50 paise per ampule.

The dairy industry uses it on animals in the mistaken belief that it increases milk production when all it does is make the milk come faster, while destroying the cow’s reproductive system. The cow goes dry in three years and is abandoned.

Not only is the cow harmed, but those who drink milk from oxytocin-injected cows are also at risk, especially children. Oxytocin causes imbalanced hearing and weak eyesight. For expecting mothers, oxytocin increases the risk of post-partum haemorrhage and can inhibit breastfeeding. Because of hormones in food, minor girls are attaining early puberty. Oxytocin is also used for growing vegetables. Injected into a pumpkin or squash, it doubles the size overnight.

Pesticides are becoming a major threat to our health. India has gone through three major tragedies — the Bhopal gas tragedy, the endosulfan tragedy in Kerala and the tragedy of Punjab’s cancer train — related to pesticides that should have woken us to the fact that pesticides kill and cripple.

We are using 750 times more pesticides than Europe, foolishly equating poisons with progress. A study carried out by the All-India Coordinated Research Project on pesticide residues in food under the India Council of Agricultural Research concluded that 51 per cent of all food items have pesticide residues, and 20 per cent had pesticide residues above permissible levels. Globally the figures are 21 per cent and two per cent respectively. Indians are being poisoned at much higher levels than the rest of the world. And these poisons have consequences for our health.

Dr Rashmi Sanghi, a research scientist at the LNM Institute of Information Technology, Jaipur, found organochlorine and organophosphorous pesticide residues in human breast milk. When other researchers analysed the blood samples of women with breast cancer in Jaipur and compared it to blood samples of women without breast cancer, they found significantly higher levels of pesticide residues in the samples from women suffering from cancer.

Even as we have an increasing disease burden due to chemicals and pollutants, there is an attempt to push GMOs despite the serious health risks they pose. We need to assess these risks on the basis of the Precautionary Principle. The principle implies that there is a social responsibility to protect the public from exposure to harm when scientific investigation has thrown data and evidence of health risks. Suppressing research on risk assessment of GMOs does not make the risks go away. A “don’t look, don’t see” policy does not make for safety.

The last Indian deserves healthy, nutritious and safe food. That is why we at Navdanya have started the campaign “Know your food, Know your farmer”. Join us, for the sake of earth and for the sake of your health.

Monsanto is the Jesuits International owned corporation: read about the structure and their use.